Earlier this month, the Department of National Defence sent a demand email to the Public Intelligence site seeking removal of the document. It is not clear whether similar demands have been sent to Wikileaks and Scribd. The demand states:
We believe that the copyright protected work of the Department of National Defence (DND) is being provided to the public through your website in a manner that constitutes copyright infringement.
The demand email continues by arguing that the document was not obtained under Access to Information and, even if it was, that ATIA does not permit widespread distribution of documents in violation of the Copyright Act. The Canadian government has altered its approach to the restrictions on publishing public documents by granting permission to reproduce government works for personal or public non-commercial purposes without the need for prior permission. In this instance, however, DND presumably believes that the document itself was made available without authorization and that the permissive licence does not apply.
What is the difference between an demand email and a cease and desist?
…
Queue the Streisand Effect
Streisand in full effect right here!
Thanks for the link, Michael.
Power Yoga
It is all about the security of the system of the country the document are allways saved in the and no one can do copy it .
http://www.wellnessbyyoga.com/
The Globe and Mail
Michael, that document was not leaked. I asked DND for it, and they sent it to me. It is, as you can see from its cover, not a classified document — as was the case with the US and British COIN manuals, which have similar content and are widely available.
As such, I can only guess that the request received by that site was a pro forma bit of copyright policing. I’ve never had any communications along these lines — only positive communications from one of the COIN manual’s authors, who was pleased to have it discussed in public.