I’ve written multiple posts on the government’s surprise decision to extend the term of copyright for sound recordings without public consultation or discussion (surprise, cost to consumers, limited competition, reduced access to Canadian heritage, lobbying impact). In recent days, a further implication has arisen: other groups are now demanding that the government extend other terms of copyright within the law. If the government agrees to those demands, it would result in all works, including books and music, being locked out of the public domain for decades.
CISAC, the International Confederation of Societies of Authors and Composers, has publicly chastised the Canadian government for not also extending the term of copyright for authors to life plus 70 years. The current term of protection in Canada is life of the author plus an additional 50 years. That meets the standard found in international copyright treaties and is what is used in a wide of range of countries including Japan, New Zealand, China, South Africa. Indeed, the majority of people around the world live in systems with copyright protection of less than life plus 70 years.
The president of CISAC states:
“Authors in Canada still do not benefit from the same term of copyright protection as in most of the world, where protection for authors extends to 70 years after their death, while in Canada the term of protection for authors expires 50 years after the author’s death. This puts the whole community of creators in Canada, as well as foreigners seeking protection in Canada, at a major disadvantage. On behalf of CISAC and the four million creators represented by its members, I call upon the Canadian government to address this imbalance and immediately bring Canada’s law in line with the rest of the world.”
As noted above, it is simply wrong to stated that Canada’s law is not in line with the rest of the world. While the demands for yet another copyright term extension were predictable, the Canadian government should reject the opportunistic attempt to lock down copyright works for decades beyond the current term of protection.
One would be surprised if such an extension would result in a single dollar more paid to the authors.
It seems very difficult to calculate an amount for each extra year of copyright.
Have such studies been made?
Stephan
Why the hell would the authors care about being paid 50 or 70 years after their deaths?! They’re DEAD.
Copyright should end with the author(s) lives, and that’s it.
The slippery slope of reactionary public policy. Important story. Thanks, Michael.
um … can someone explain to me this: if they are DEAD, precisely how does this extension benefit the AUTHORS? The body is just bones after only a dozen years or so!