Text: Small Text  Normal Text  Large Text  Larger Text
  • Select an Issue...
  • Music and the Law

Blog Archive

PrevPrevApril 2014NextNext
SMTWTFS
  12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930

Soccer Broadcaster Offside With Demands

PDF  | Print |  E-mail
Thursday May 11, 2006
Soccer fans around the world are anxiously anticipating this summer's FIFA World Cup.  FIFA's broadcast partner, Infront Sports and Media, is apparently looking ahead to the World Cup for a different reason.  With the exclusive broadcast rights in hand, Infront's lawyers are sending pre-emptive notice and takedown notifications to Internet service providers.  One Canadian ISP has received a letter from Baker & McKenzie, the Infront's Canadian counsel, in which the firm notes the potential for the posting of unauthorized clips or images from the games and demands:

"Should your service be used for the purpose of such unlawful activities we will alert you as a matter of urgency and trust you will assist in taking down any infringing material so you can avoid any joint liability for such infringements, as well as assisting us in identifying the infringers."

While the World Cup is an important sports event, is it really so important that its rights holders and their lawyers believe that Canadian law doesn't apply to them?   At least three issues come to mind.
First, Canada does not have a notice and takedown system, but rather an informal notice and notice agreement that even rightsholders such as AOL/Time Warner believe is suitable.  This system requires that ISPs only notify subscribers of allegations of infringement with the takedown only coming under court order.  If this system is good enough for child pornography, surely it is good enough for a video clip of soccer game.  Second, the veiled threat of joint liability is simply nonsense.  There is no legal reason to believe that an intermediary would be held liable for the allegedly infringing actions of a subscriber where it declines a demand to takedown content absent a court order.  Third, the request to assist in the identification of alleged infringers is particularly offensive, since runs completely counter to Canada's privacy legislation and the Federal Count of Appeal's BMG v. Doe decision that set out a clear roadmap for the disclosure of such personal information.

It is abusive demands such as these that give many Canadians reason for concern about overly aggressive rights holders who shoot first and aim later.  Rather than a pre-emptive takedown notification, this situation seems to call for a pre-emptive privacy education from the Privacy Commissioner of Canada for Insight and its lawyers.
Comments (3)add comment

Leo said:

The COC has also done this kind of thing
The Olympics will be coming to town in 2010, and already we've seen evidence as to how the sphere of what can be owned or controlled is being expanded to cover questionable "property" rights. For example last year the Canadian Olympic Committee claimed it had exclusive control over the "right to associate" with the city of Turin (see http://www.google.com/search?q...cs%20turin), when ESSO dared to have a contest to send Canadians there while the Olympics were going on. Unfortunately ESSO caved to the strong-arm tactics and cancelled the contest. Now I'm not an IP lawyer, but I am not aware of any laws that dictate ownership of "association" between events and cities. Perhaps I just haven't been paying enough attention.
May 13, 2006

Samizdat said:

And lawyers wonder while they\'re held i

"It is abusive demands such as these that give many Canadians reason for
concern about overly aggressive rights holders who shoot first and aim later...."

This hits the nail precisely on the head. What I am wondering is, surely
the Canadian counsel for the rights holders must realize that its demands
are NOT in accordance with existing Canadian law. How is it that they can
get away with making demands like this? Is there no legal or ethical
obligation for counsel to tell the truth? Is it considered appropriate
for counsel to invent a scenario out of whole cloth and then pass it off
as legal advice? Where the hell is the Law Society when you need them?


May 14, 2006

soccer said:

http://www.articleworld.org/soccer
Check out this introduction article on soccer:
http://www.articleworld.org/soccer
content:
1.History
2.Laws
3.Fouls
4.Scoring and winning

Learn a bit about Zindine Zidane and his last World Cup,
at: http://www.articleworld.org/Zi...ine_Zidane
May 18, 2006

Write comment
smaller | bigger

busy
Tags:
, ,
Share: Slashdot, Digg, Del.icio.us, Newsfeeder, Reddit, StumbleUpon, TwitterEmailPrintPDF
Related Items: